The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 40 percent for a back disability was withdrawn before the Board made a decision.,Claims for earlier effective dates for noncompensable ratings for residual scars due to bilateral gynecomastia and left foot scar were dismissed as administrative actions.,Service connection is granted for an acquired psychiatric disorder, erectile dysfunction, and a sleep disorder other than as a residual of the acquired psychiatric disorder.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his claim for a rating in excess of 40 percent for a back disability before the Board made a decision.,The effective dates for noncompensable ratings for residual scars due to bilateral gynecomastia and left foot scar were changed administratively, not appealed as a question of law or fact.,Service connection is granted because there is new evidence supporting the claim for an acquired psychiatric disorder, erectile dysfunction, and a sleep disorder other than as a residual of the acquired psychiatric disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- Acquired psychiatric disorder, Erectile dysfunction, Sleep disorder
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 2, 2023
- Citation
- A23027378
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23027378.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a low back disability and an increased rating for his acquired psychiatric disorder. The Board found that there was no evidence linking the current disabilities to military service.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of prostate cancer due to VA's failure to notify him of his April 17, 2008, elevated PSA test results and its failure to timely diagnose and properly treat his disease.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a determination on whether injuries sustained in a November 2001 incident were in the line of duty. The claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is also remanded due to its interdependence with the line of duty issue.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for further development due to insufficient evidence and need for additional examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.