The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate VA medical opinion regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's cause of death, specifically his diagnosis of mononucleosis in service.
The deciding factor: The Board found a pre-decisional duty to assist error by not ensuring an adequate VA medical opinion had been obtained for the nature and etiology of the Veteran's cause of death.
- Claimed conditions
- Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Blastic Crisis, Bilateral Bronchopneumonia
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 12, 2023
- Citation
- A23028267
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23028267.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's death was caused by chronic myelogenous leukemia, a condition that is not service-connected. The Board granted the claim for DIC based on this finding.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic myelogenous leukemia is granted with an effective date of March 15, 2016.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic myelogenous leukemia, finding that it is not a B-cell leukemia and thus not presumptively associated with exposure to herbicide agents during his service.
- Granted
The Board has restored service connection for chronic myelogenous leukemia due to the Veteran's exposure to Agent Orange during his service in Vietnam. The original grant of service connection was based on presumptive conditions, but the Board found that this decision was not clearly erroneous and thus restoration is granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.