The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), finding that there is at least an even balance of evidence to support the claim, and resolving reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on the Veteran's lay statements regarding his symptoms during and since service, which were found credible despite the absence of a diagnosis in his STRs.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 24, 2023
- Citation
- A23029382
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23029382.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions and a need for additional examinations, including a toxic exposure risk activity (TERA) examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the issues of entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus, pulmonary embolus (PE), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) due to insufficient evidence in the current record. The Veteran's hypertension is granted as secondary to his service-connected hypothyroidism.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral lower extremity DVT and entitlement to a TDIU based on the Veteran's continuous symptoms since service separation. The effective date is March 12, 2011.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.