The Veteran's claim to reopen a previously denied service connection for end stage glaucoma with pseudophakia and trace cataracts is dismissed as the appeal is not eligible for review under the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA).
The deciding factor: The Veteran did not opt into the AMA review system following issuance of an SOC and the claim was not adjudicated as part of RAMP.
- Claimed conditions
- end stage glaucoma, pseudophakia, trace cataracts
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 3, 2023
- Citation
- A23030858
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23030858.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a left eye disorder, including amblyopia and other conditions, as there was no evidence of aggravation beyond their natural progression during the Veteran's periods of active duty.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for an eye disability, including dry eye syndrome, pseudophakia, and glaucoma, finding that there is no evidence linking these conditions to his active duty service or a service-connected condition.
- Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for an eye disability, granted a 70% rating for PTSD, and granted TDIU due to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities.
- Granted
The veteran's service connection claims for diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, pseudophakia, and bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy were granted based on presumed exposure to herbicide agents during service at Fort McClellan.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.