The Veteran's neuropathic pain from left cheek cyst removal was not caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or fault. The Board found no evidence to support the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner opined that the Veteran's neuropathic pain was a known complication of the procedure and not due to any carelessness, negligence, or fault on the part of VA personnel.
- Claimed conditions
- neuropathic pain from left cheek cyst removal
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 14, 2023
- Citation
- A23031882
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23031882.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's neuropathic pain from left cheek cyst removal was not caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or fault. The Board found no evidence to support the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for neuropathic pain from left cheek cyst removal is remanded due to non-compliance with the Board's previous instructions.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.