Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

A 60 percent disability rating for coronary artery disease status post myocardial infarction, inferior wall, with hyperlipidemia is granted from October 12, 2016, to the date of the Veteran's death.,A 60 percent disability rating for coronary artery disease status post myocardial infarction, inferior wall, with hyperlipidemia is granted from February 5, 2016, to October 11, 2016.,A 60 percent disability rating for coronary artery disease status post myocardial infarction, inferior wall, with hyperlipidemia is granted from January 1, 2016, to February 4, 2016.,The Veteran's claim for a higher rating prior to January 1, 2016, was denied.

The deciding factor: The evidence is in equipoise as to whether from October 12, 2016, to the date of the Veteran's death, coronary artery disease status post myocardial infarction, inferior wall, with hyperlipidemia was manifested by left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30 to 50 percent.,The weight of evidence shows that from February 5, 2016, to October 11, 2016, coronary artery disease status post myocardial infarction, inferior wall, with hyperlipidemia was manifested by left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30 to 50 percent.,The weight of evidence shows that from January 1, 2016, to February 4, 2016, coronary artery disease status post myocardial infarction, inferior wall, with hyperlipidemia was manifested by left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30 to 50 percent.,The evidence persuasively weighs against a finding that prior to January 1, 2016, coronary artery disease status post myocardial infarction, inferior wall, with hyperlipidemia was manifested by chronic congestive heart failure; a workload of three METs or less resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope; or left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of less than 30 percent.

Claimed conditions
Coronary artery disease status post myocardial infarction, inferior wall, Hyperlipidemia
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
60%
Decision date
November 22, 2023
Citation
A23033242

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23033242.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.