The Board has decided to remand the claims for service connection of right and left eye conditions due to inadequate VA examination reports. A new examination is needed to clarify whether these conditions are related to service or a pre-existing condition.
The deciding factor: The previous VA examinations were insufficient in addressing the etiology of the Veteran's current eye disabilities, particularly regarding their relationship to his service-connected traumatic macular scarring.
- Claimed conditions
- Right eye condition, Left eye condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 27, 2023
- Citation
- A23033390
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23033390.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's left eye condition, finding that his pre-existing condition was aggravated during service.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for acne scarring of the posterior trunk and upper anterior trunk, based upon aggravation in service. The claims for a left eye condition, an initial, compensable rating for COPD, and TDIU were remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors, including a lack of VA treatment records and an inadequate medical opinion. The Veteran's claim will be reconsidered with all available evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a right eye condition and an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD and depression. The decision found that there was no evidence of aggravation of pre-existing conditions during service and that the Veteran did not have a current psychiatric condition at any time during or approximate to the pendency of the claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.