The Veteran's cardiac disability was granted effective February 6, 2013. A rating of 100 percent for the period prior to April 13, 2016, is granted.,A compensable rating for erectile dysfunction and an effective date of January 6, 2016, are granted.,SMC based on loss of use of a creative organ is granted with an effective date of January 6, 2016.,The Veteran's right middle finger crush injury is rated at 10 percent.,Eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 35 was granted effective February 6, 2013.,SMC based on housebound status and a higher level of SMC above the housebound criteria level are denied.,For the period prior to January 6, 2016, entitlement to a TDIU is dismissed as moot.
The deciding factor: The evidence supports a 100 percent rating for the Veteran's cardiac disability due to his longstanding ejection fraction of less than 30 percent.
- Claimed conditions
- Cardiomyopathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 100%
- Decision date
- December 4, 2023
- Citation
- A23034381
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23034381.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for heart condition was granted with an effective date of August 1, 2019. The decision is based on evidence showing exposure to diesel and gas fuel during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's heart conditions may be related to his service-connected sleep apnea and/or generalized anxiety disorder, but further examination is needed to determine causation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of adequate medical opinion regarding the Veteran's heart conditions and their relation to service. The Veteran is asked to provide an addendum opinion from a qualified medical professional.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of CUE in the December 2005 rating decision that assigned a 60 percent initial disability rating for cardiomyopathy with pulmonary hypertension, finding no clear and unmistakable error.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.