The Veteran's esophageal carcinoma status post esophagectomy with recurrent anastomotic stricture is rated at 30 percent, and the evidence does not show that it permits liquids only.,The Veteran's scars are rated based on their size under the current VA rating criteria. The pre-August 13, 2018 ratings were used for these cases.,Neither of the Veteran's scar disabilities meet the criteria for a compensable rating.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not show that the esophageal stricture permits liquids only, which is required for a 50 percent rating under Code 7203. The symptoms and impairment shown are contemplated in the current 30 percent rating.,Under the pre-August 13, 2018 criteria, the Veteran's scars do not meet the requirements for any compensable ratings as they are superficial and do not cover at least six square inches (39 sq. cm.) or more of area.,The post-August 13, 2018 criteria provide no higher rating options for the Veteran's scars.
- Claimed conditions
- esophageal carcinoma status post esophagectomy with recurrent anastomotic stricture, scar, right flank, scar, chest
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 19, 2023
- Citation
- A23036619
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23036619.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a VA examination to address whether the Veteran's chest scar is related to her active service, specifically a burn from an M16 shell during basic training.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for a chest scar and denied the claim as there is no persuasive evidence showing that the current condition began during active service or is related to an in-service injury.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.