The Veteran's nerve damage with chronic inflammation as a result of GERD is not rated higher than the current 60 percent assigned for GERD. The initial 30 percent rating for eosinophilic esophagitis has been granted.
The deciding factor: The symptoms of nerve damage and chronic inflammation are already considered in the existing rating for GERD, which includes severe impairment of health due to daily pain, difficulty swallowing, hoarseness, and other issues. The evidence does not show additional symptoms attributable to this condition that warrant a higher rating.
- Claimed conditions
- Nerve Damage with Chronic Inflammation as a Result of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder (GERD), Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- December 22, 2023
- Citation
- A23037138
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A23037138.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's right knee instability and eosinophilic esophagitis have been granted initial ratings of 10 percent for the knee disabilities, but a 30 percent rating has been assigned for eosinophilic esophagitis. The decision is based on current symptomatology and medical evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.