Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for a compensable evaluation for plantar warts of the left foot and service connection for plantar warts of the right foot are remanded due to inadequate VA examination reports.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral pes planus and left foot strain is remanded due to inadequate VA examination reports.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea is remanded due to inadequate VA examination reports.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for abnormal blood pressure, including hypertension is remanded due to inadequate VA examination reports.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hand carpel tunnel syndrome is remanded due to inadequate VA examination reports.

The deciding factor: The VA examinations did not adequately address the Veteran's lay contentions regarding symptom onset and severity, nor did they provide a rationale based on all available evidence.,The VA examinations did not adequately address the Veteran's lay contentions regarding symptom onset and severity, nor did they provide a rationale based on all available evidence.,The VA examinations did not adequately address the Veteran's lay contentions regarding symptom onset and severity, nor did they provide a rationale based on all available evidence.,The VA examinations did not adequately address the Veteran's lay contentions regarding symptom onset and severity, nor did they provide a rationale based on all available evidence.,The VA examinations did not adequately address the Veteran's lay contentions regarding symptom onset and severity, nor did they provide a rationale based on all available evidence.

Claimed conditions
plantar warts of the left foot, plantar warts of the right foot, bilateral pes planus, left foot strain, abnormal blood pressure, including hypertension, bilateral hand carpel tunnel syndrome
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 10, 2023
Citation
23037915

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23037915.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.