Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The appeal of the compensable rating for bilateral shin splints and earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for bilateral shin splints is dismissed.,The claim to reopen service connection for cervical spine disability is granted, but a higher rating remains denied.,The Veteran's urinary incontinence prior to September 6, 2018, does not warrant a compensable rating. From September 6, 2018, the current 40 percent rating is appropriate.,Restoration of a 40 percent rating for lumbar spine disability from July 31, 2014, to present is granted.,The Veteran's lumbar spine disability does not meet criteria for higher than 40 percent ratings at any point during the appeal period.

The deciding factor: The issues of bilateral shin splints and earlier effective date were withdrawn by the Veteran's representative prior to the Board's decision.,New evidence received since January 2004 rating decision supports reopening the claim for cervical spine disability, but service connection is not established.,Urinary incontinence did not require absorbent materials or an appliance before September 6, 2018. From that date, it required changing absorbent materials two to four times per day, warranting a 40 percent rating.,The lumbar spine disability was reduced from 40 percent to 20 percent in July 31, 2014, due to improvement shown by VA examinations. The reduction is upheld as the evidence does not show sustained material improvement.,Lumbar spine disability did not demonstrate unfavorable ankylosis or IVDS with more than six weeks of incapacitating episodes.

Claimed conditions
bilateral shin splints, cervical spine disability, urinary incontinence, lumbar spine disability, dystonia (claimed as involuntary muscle movement), arthritis (claimed in all joints)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 12, 2023
Citation
23038374

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23038374.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.