The Veteran's hypertension is granted as presumptively related to herbicide exposure during service.,Left leg and neck carotid artery disease are not presumed or directly linked to service, but the appeal is granted due to the PACT Act which now includes this condition in the list of diseases presumptively associated with herbicide exposure.,Cerebral vascular accident (stroke) is not presumed or directly linked to service, and the appeal is denied.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's hypertension was diagnosed after separation from service but is now considered a disease presumptively related to herbicide exposure under the PACT Act.,Left leg and neck carotid artery disease are not listed among diseases presumed due to herbicide exposure, so the presumption does not apply. However, the appeal is granted as part of the PACT Act's expansion of eligible conditions.,Cerebral vascular accident (stroke) was not diagnosed during service or within one year following separation and there is no evidence linking it to service.
- Claimed conditions
- hypertension, left leg and neck carotid artery disease, cerebral vascular accident (stroke)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 12, 2023
- Citation
- 23038650
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23038650.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension and increased rating for anxiety disorder have been denied. The Board found that there is no evidence of a current disability meeting the criteria for hypertension, and the Veteran's anxiety disorder does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.