The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's current nasal vestibulitis with alar prominence, which is claimed as MRSA. The claim will be re-adjudicated after obtaining a clarifying VA medical opinion.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner provided an inadequate opinion and did not consider the Veteran's lay assertions or post-service treatment records in determining the etiology of his current nasal vestibulitis with alar prominence.
- Claimed conditions
- nasal vestibulitis with alar prominence, methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 18, 2023
- Citation
- 23039549
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23039549.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and an initial compensable evaluation for acne with folliculitis and epidermal cyst.
- Granted
The Board grants service connection for nasal vestibulitis with alar prominence based on evidence that the disability had its onset during and has continued since active duty.
- Denied
The Veteran's MRSA disability was not actually caused by the VA treatment in September 2017, and therefore compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 are denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and development of his exposure history. The issues include pseudofolliculitis barbae, a skin disability other than PFB, and a right eye disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.