The Veteran's claims for service connection for sebaceous carcinoma of the head and squamous cell carcinoma of the head have been granted due to the PACT Act, which establishes presumptive service connection based on in-service exposure. The rating assigned has not yet been determined.
The deciding factor: Service connection is granted under the PACT Act's provisions for veterans who served in Southwest Asia after August 2, 1990, and are presumed exposed to burn pits and other toxins.
- Claimed conditions
- menstrual disorders, ovarian cysts, sebaceous carcinoma of the head, squamous cell carcinoma of the head
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 21, 2023
- Citation
- 23040131
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23040131.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's cervical carcinoma in situ with ovarian cysts, and chronic migraine-type headaches are being remanded for further examination and opinion as the current evidence is insufficient to establish a causal relationship between these conditions and her military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's sinusitis is granted a 10 percent rating, but no higher.,Her ovarian cysts are denied a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for hysterectomy, finding that her hysterectomy is etiologically related to her in-service pelvic pain and ovarian cysts.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for service connection for menorrhagia and ovarian cysts due to inadequate medical opinions regarding potential exposure to burn pits. The AOJ is instructed to obtain new medical opinions addressing whether there is a link between the Veteran's conditions and her in-service exposure to toxic exposure risk activities (TERAs).
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.