Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's use of chlorhexidine gluconate, an antiseptic skin cleanser, caused irreparable damage to his outer garments during the Year 2018. The Board granted a clothing allowance for this period.

The deciding factor: The Veteran provided credible lay statements that the use of antiseptic skin cleanser resulted in irreparable damage to his outer garments, and the VHA Clothing Allowance Handbook identified chlorhexidine gluconate as causing such damage.

Claimed conditions
right Achilles and left knee replacement scar residuals
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
100%
Decision date
July 21, 2023
Citation
23040249

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23040249.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.