Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's groin condition with scar is being remanded due to inadequate VA examination findings.,The Veteran's cerebral hemangioblastoma residuals with scar are being remanded due to inadequate VA examination findings and the need for a toxic exposure screening.,The Veteran's pancreatitis, GERD, and cervical spine disability are being remanded as they are intertwined with his cerebral hemangioblastoma claim on appeal.,The Veteran's OSA is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination addressing obesity as an intermediate step.,The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is being remanded due to inadequate VA examination findings and the need for a VA examination addressing obesity as an intermediate step.,The Veteran's hypertension is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination.,The Veteran's lymph node condition is being remanded due to the need for a VA toxic exposure screening.

The deciding factor: VA examinations of record are inadequate and require further evaluation, including another VA examination.,Exposure to various toxins during service needs to be considered in determining whether the Veteran's cerebral hemangioblastoma residuals with scar is related to service.,Obesity as an intermediate step between a service-connected disability and current disability may need to be evaluated for secondary service connection.,Obesity as an intermediate step between a service-connected disability and current disability needs to be evaluated for secondary service connection.,Obesity as an intermediate step between a service-connected disability and current disability needs to be evaluated for secondary service connection.,A VA examination is needed to determine whether the Veteran's hypertension is related to service exposure or obesity, which itself may be related to his service-connected disabilities.,A toxic exposure screening is needed to evaluate the Veteran's lymph node condition.

Claimed conditions
hemorrhoids, skin condition of the face (rosacea), groin condition with scar, brain tumor residuals with scar, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with scar, pancreatitis, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), erectile dysfunction, hypertension, cervical spine disability with scar, lymph node condition, left foot scar
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 1, 2023
Citation
23041981

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23041981.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.