The Board found no evidence to support the Veteran's claim that his complications following a right hydrocelectomy were caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or similar fault. The Veteran's condition was not due to an unforeseeable event and there is no indication of failure to obtain informed consent.
The deciding factor: The August 2022 VA examiner concluded that the Veteran's urinary leakage could be related to other conditions such as diabetes mellitus rather than a complication from the hydrocelectomy procedure performed in 2009.
- Claimed conditions
- hydrocele
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 3, 2023
- Citation
- 23042613
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23042613.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim of service connection for hydrocele due to incomplete medical history and inadequate VA examination. The case is being sent back for an addendum opinion from a clinician regarding the etiology of the Veteran's hydrocele.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's hydrocele disability. The Veteran is seeking service connection for this condition, which he contends is related to his hernia disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for his testicle conditions (hydrocele and epidydimal cysts) due to insufficient evidence regarding the extent of atrophy in his testicles. The case is being returned to the AOJ for additional development.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claimed conditions, including kidney stones, chronic kidney disease, microscopic hematuria, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and hydrocele, were not shown to have originated during active service. The Board denied the claim for service connection as there was no evidence of a nexus between these conditions and active duty.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.