Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for service connection for allergies has been denied as there is no evidence of a link between the Veteran's current symptoms and his active-duty service.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes, unspecified gout, and unspecified arthritis have been remanded to obtain VA examinations and opinions on their etiology. The conditions are presumed to be related to exposure to contaminated water at Camp LeJeune during service.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for asthma has been remanded to obtain a VA examination and opinion on its etiology.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for back disability, left knee disability, left leg disability, right ankle disability, and right knee disability have been remanded to obtain VA examinations and opinions on their etiology.

The deciding factor: Service connection cannot be granted as there is no evidence of a link between the Veteran's current symptoms and his active-duty service.,The conditions are presumed to be related to exposure to contaminated water at Camp LeJeune during service, but further examination and opinion are needed to determine their etiology.,Further examination and opinion are needed to determine if the Veteran's asthma is related to his active-duty service.,Further examination and opinion are needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed back, left knee, left leg, right ankle, and right knee disabilities.

Claimed conditions
Allergies, Diabetes, Unspecified Gout, Unspecified Arthritis, Asthma, Back Disability (including back pain), Left Knee Disability (including left knee pain), Left Leg Disability (including left leg pain), Right Ankle Disability (including right ankle pain), Right Knee Disability (including right knee pain)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 6, 2023
Citation
23043650

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23043650.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.