The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for left knee disabilities due to inadequate VA examinations and failure to address certain findings. The claims will be remanded for further development, including an examination that tests range of motion in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing.
The deciding factor: The Board found there was no substantial compliance with previous remand directives regarding the adequacy of VA examinations and failed to address specific findings related to pain during motion testing.
- Claimed conditions
- status post arthroscopy of the left knee, left knee instability associated with status post arthroscopy of the left knee, arthritis due to trauma of the right knee
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 11, 2023
- Citation
- 23044803
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23044803.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his left and right knee disabilities, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the current disability levels.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to failure to comply with prior remand instructions regarding obtaining medical records from Ochsner Medical Center. The Veteran is required to provide any missing records and VA will attempt to obtain them.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his left knee disabilities were denied. The RO assigned separate noncompensable evaluations for each disability effective from October 1, 2005.
- Denied
The Veteran's left knee disability, including a status-post medial collateral ligament tear and arthroscopy, was evaluated at 20 percent prior to February 15, 2007, and at 30 percent since then. The Board denied the claim for increased ratings.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.