Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's service connection for tinnitus is granted.,For the period prior to April 8, 2017, a rating in excess of 20 percent for lumbar DDD L5-S1 is denied. From April 8, 2017, a 40 percent rating is granted and a separate 20 percent rating is granted for each lower extremity radiculopathy.,The Veteran's right knee chondromalacia patella and meniscus residuals are rated at the noncompensable level. The scars on his knees and feet are also rated as noncompensable.,Service connection for PTSD is granted with an initial 50 percent rating, but not higher.

The deciding factor: The evidence is at least evenly balanced as to whether the Veteran's current tinnitus is related to his active military service.,Prior to April 8, 2017, the Veteran's low back symptoms more nearly approximated forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees. From April 8, 2017, the symptomatology more nearly approximated forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine to 30 degrees or less.,From October 5, 2016, the Veteran experienced right knee pain with noncompensable motion loss associated with chondromalacia. From October 5, 2016, he had right knee meniscus tear residuals that more nearly approximated cartilage, semilunar, symptomatic removal.,The Veteran's right and left knee surgical scars measure no more than 1 centimeter by 1 centimeter (cm), do not more nearly approximate a painful scar, and do not cause additional functional impairment of the affected area. The Veteran's right foot scar manifested by a single painful linear scar without skin instability.,The Veteran's painful right foot scar does not cause any functional impairment of the affected area.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) L5-S1, right lower extremity radiculopathy, left lower extremity radiculopathy, right knee chondromalacia patella, scar, right knee, scar, left knee, scar, right foot, scar, left foot
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 22, 2023
Citation
23046530

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23046530.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.