The Board has dismissed the appeals for higher rating for multiple lipomas and total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to the appellant's withdrawal of his appeal.
The deciding factor: The appellant, through his authorized representative, withdrew his appeal prior to the decision being promulgated.
- Claimed conditions
- multiple lipomas
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 6, 2023
- Citation
- 23048778
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23048778.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted an effective date of March 31, 2016, for the award of TDIU based on a finding that the Veteran detrimentally relied on misleading VA communications.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, vertigo, multiple lipomas, chronic fatigue syndrome, and erectile dysfunction due to outstanding private treatment records and inadequate VA medical opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current chronic headache disability and therefore denied his claim for service connection. The claims for higher ratings on multiple lipomas, right shoulder disability, and TDIU are being remanded due to lack of substantial compliance with prior remand directives.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for multiple lipomas was denied due to lack of new and relevant evidence.,The Veteran's claim for residuals of conjunctival malignant melanoma, right eye, was also denied due to lack of new and relevant evidence.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.