The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence on whether the Veteran's heart condition, including atrial fibrillation and left anterior fascicular block, is related to his service or herbicide exposure.
The deciding factor: The VA determined that circulatory disorders have no positive association with herbicide exposure but A-Fib may not be a circulatory disorder. Therefore, a VA examination and nexus opinion are required under the PACT Act.
- Claimed conditions
- left anterior fascicular block, low voltage EKG with ventricular delay, atriial fibrillation (A-Fib)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 11, 2023
- Citation
- 23050088
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23050088.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeals for service connection due to his death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for sinus bradycardia but has remanded the remaining heart conditions due to insufficient medical opinions.
- Granted
The Veteran's heart condition, including atrioventricular block and arrhythmia, is presumed to have been caused by his exposure to burn pits during service in Iraq. The Board finds that the symptoms qualify as an undiagnosed illness under Persian Gulf War Syndrome criteria.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.