The Board denied the Veteran's claim for medical reimbursement of non-VA medical care received on December 5, 2017, as there was no prior authorization from VA and the treatment did not meet the criteria for emergency treatment.
The deciding factor: The treatment provided by Dr. G.M. on December 5, 2017, was not considered emergency treatment due to the delay in seeking care after the initial surgery, which rendered it non-emergent.
- Claimed conditions
- Hand injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 28, 2023
- Citation
- 23054235
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23054235.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of VA authorizations for treatment received on June 15, 2017. The Veteran's claim will be reconsidered with these additional records.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for GERD, back injuries, hand injuries and foot injuries have been denied as there is no evidence of a current disability related to the in-service incidents.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right hand injury was a result of willful misconduct, and therefore denied service connection for residuals of an injury to his hand.
- Whole decision: Denied
The veteran does not meet the basic eligibility requirements for nonservice-connected pension benefits as he did not serve 90 days or more of active duty during a period of war, and was discharged due to receiving disability compensation rather than a service-connected disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.