The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's seroma disability was a foreseeable consequence of the March 2013 panniculectomy surgery and aftercare, and if so, whether VA's standard of care was appropriate. The AOJ must also obtain all relevant treatment records.
The deciding factor: The Board found that additional medical opinions are needed to address theories of entitlement raised by the record regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- rectus muscle disability, chronic seroma, hematoma, capsulated seroma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 10, 2023
- Citation
- 23055235
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23055235.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection on multiple conditions has been dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of a total left knee replacement was denied because the evidence did not support finding that the additional disabilities were caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or error in judgment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's bowel duct problems and scar are being remanded for further evaluation due to inadequate medical opinion regarding the relationship between her conditions and VA treatment. The issue of service connection is also being remanded.
- Granted
The Board has granted compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a hematoma, recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), and urinary incontinence resulting from VA treatment between October 6, 2014 to October 23, 2014. The issue of entitlement to special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance or being housebound is remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.