The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for thickened bladder walls and prostate hypertrophy due to insufficient medical opinions addressing whether these conditions are related to his Gulf War service. The VA is instructed to obtain a new opinion that addresses both the pathophysiology and etiology of the conditions in the context of the Veteran's unique circumstances.
The deciding factor: The Board found the previous opinions inadequate as they did not address the understanding of the pathophysiology and etiology of the conditions in the context of the Veteran's unique circumstances, nor did they provide a rationale for their conclusions.
- Claimed conditions
- thickened bladder walls, prostate hypertrophy
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 10, 2023
- Citation
- 23055339
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23055339.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for prostate hypertrophy as there was no evidence linking the condition to in-service disease or injury.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection and special monthly compensation due to an error in a TERA memorandum regarding the Veteran's exposure during his service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the case to obtain a VA medical opinion that addresses whether the Veteran's prostate hypertrophy is secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II and/or coronary artery disease.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a higher rating for hypertension, service connection for PTSD, and service connection for prostate hypertrophy. The denial for PTSD was due to lack of new and relevant evidence.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.