Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's right foot onychomycosis is not service-connected as it is not related to his active duty service or his service-connected right knee conditions.,The Veteran's right knee instability warrants a rating of 30 percent, and higher ratings are precluded due to the amputation rule.,For the period prior to October 1, 2018, the Veteran's right lower extremity radiculopathy does not warrant a rating in excess of 20 percent.,Beginning October 1, 2018, the Veteran's right lower extremity radiculopathy warrants a rating of 20 percent and higher ratings are precluded due to the amputation rule.,The Veteran is eligible for specially adapted housing but not for special home adaptation grant.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran's right foot onychomycosis is etiologically related to his active duty service or his service-connected right knee conditions. The examiner opined that it was less likely than not caused by these conditions.,The Veteran's right knee instability has resulted in a combined rating of 60 percent for his right knee conditions and an 80 percent rating for his right lower extremity conditions, which precludes higher ratings based on the amputation rule.,For the period prior to October 1, 2018, the Veteran's right lower extremity radiculopathy did not meet the criteria for a higher rating as it did not approximate moderately severe or severe incomplete paralysis or complete paralysis.,Beginning October 1, 2018, the Veteran's right lower extremity radiculopathy met the criteria for a higher rating of 20 percent and precluded any further increase due to the amputation rule.,The Veteran's overall disability results in the loss or loss of use of his lower extremities, which affects the functions of balance and propulsion as to preclude locomotion without the aid of a walker, cane, or wheelchair.

Claimed conditions
Right foot onychomycosis, Sleep apnea, Psychiatric conditions
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 10, 2023
Citation
23055376

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23055376.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.