The Veteran's effective date for a 50% disability rating for total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is set to August 29, 2015.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on the fact that entitlement arose during service and VA medical records were submitted within one year of the initial rating decision.
- Claimed conditions
- total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 50%
- Decision date
- October 11, 2023
- Citation
- 23055630
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23055630.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, tension headaches with migraine components, and lumbosacral strain and spinal stenosis with degenerative disc disease, prevent her from securing or following substantially gainful employment. The Board has granted TDIU for the entire appeal period.
- Denied
The Board denied an earlier effective date for the award of service connection for a total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and special monthly compensation (SMC) based on loss of use of a creative organ, as there is no legal basis to assign an earlier effective date.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the Veteran's service connection claim for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, but has remanded the case due to the need for an addendum opinion regarding whether PCOS is a congenital or developmental defect.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions and rationale in a previous VA examination regarding the Veteran's employability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.