The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for bilateral lower extremity amputations was denied due to the conclusion that his additional disability did not result from VA negligence, carelessness, or lack of proper skill. The service connection claims for an acquired psychiatric disorder and TDIU were also denied as there is no persuasive evidence linking these conditions to military service or a service-connected disability.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral lower extremity amputations did not result from VA negligence, carelessness, or lack of proper skill. The additional disability was caused by his own actions (smoking) and the natural progression of his underlying conditions rather than any fault on the part of VA.
- Claimed conditions
- Peripheral Vascular Disease, Buerger's Disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 16, 2023
- Citation
- 23056272
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23056272.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for peripheral vascular disease as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus type II.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for peripheral vascular disease. The issues of service connection for emphysema, COPD, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and pulmonary vascular disease (idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension) are remanded due to inadequate medical opinions.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his service-connected peripheral vascular disease were denied as the evidence did not show that he met the criteria for a higher evaluation under Diagnostic Code 7114.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for Peripheral Vascular Disease, a Heart Disability manifested by chest pain (including coronary artery disease), and Carotid Artery Stenosis due to the lack of evidence showing these conditions were present in service or until many years thereafter, and they are not shown to be related to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.