The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for a lung disorder and a dermatological condition due to incomplete development. The claims will be readjudicated after obtaining necessary medical opinions and determining eligibility for dental treatment.
The deciding factor: Incomplete development of the claims, including lack of proper medical opinions and referral to VAMC for eligibility determination.
- Claimed conditions
- lung disorder, claimed as asbestosis, dermatological condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 18, 2023
- Citation
- 23056760
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23056760.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for a lung disorder, claimed as asbestosis and sleep apnea, to include as due to in-service exposure of asbestos, for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to exposure to Agent Orange, as well as the claim to reopen a previously denied myasthenia gravis claim. The VA is directed to obtain all relevant VA treatment records and ensure that the May 1989 rating decision is associated with the record.
- Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for dizziness, a dermatological condition, and COPD all secondary to exposure to chemical dioxins (Agent Orange). The VA found no evidence linking these conditions to his military service or Agent Orange exposure.
- Dismissed
The veteran withdrew his appeals for the issues related to dermatological condition, right hip condition, diabetic retinopathy, podiatry condition, and bladder condition with urination problems.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.