The Board has remanded the Veteran's appeal for further development to ensure that VA fulfilled its duty to assist in obtaining private treatment records from Dr. R.P., and to obtain an adequate VA examination addressing symptoms of reflux nephropathy throughout the appeal period.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded due to inconsistencies in the Veteran's statements regarding her receipt of private treatment from Dr. R.P. during the appeal period, and for inadequate consideration of whether the service-connected disability should be rated analogously to Diagnostic Codes 7510 or 7511.
- Claimed conditions
- Reflux nephropathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 24, 2023
- Citation
- 23057615
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23057615.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for her service-connected reflux nephropathy is being remanded due to the need for further development, including obtaining private treatment records and providing a medical opinion regarding the severity of her symptoms and their relation to her medications.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for further development regarding urinary frequency and voiding dysfunction related to his kidney condition.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.