The Board has remanded the cases due to non-compliance with previous directives and inextricably intertwined issues. The TMJ disorder case requires an addendum medical opinion, while the TDIU case is also remanded.
The deciding factor: The decision was not about service connection for a TMJ disorder as it pertains to both service connection and TDIU which are interrelated.
- Claimed conditions
- TMJ disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 25, 2023
- Citation
- 23057849
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23057849.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's migraine headaches are rated at 50% and cannot be increased.,SMC at the housebound rate is granted from January 11, 2021 due to multiple service-connected disabilities.,A TDIU rating effective October 28, 2011 is granted based on inability to secure or follow substantially gainful employment due to migraine headaches.,Eligibility for DEA benefits is granted but no earlier than the date of claim (April 5, 1999).
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's TMJ disorder is related to his service and grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's PTSD is currently rated as 70 percent disabling, but the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted due to lack of total occupational and social impairment. The Veteran also does not meet criteria for TDIU based on her service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure to provide proper notice regarding the right to a hearing on a supplemental claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.