Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for effective dates prior to August 1, 2017, for service connection for left and right upper extremity radiculopathy are denied.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a low back disability is granted with an effective date of August 1, 2017.,The Veteran's claims for secondary service connection for bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy, left knee disability, and right knee disability are granted.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for a left shoulder disability and right shoulder disability are remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a headache disability is remanded.

The deciding factor: No exceptions to the general rule apply. In light of the finality of the prior rating decision, the appropriate effective date for the award of service connection is August 1, 2017.,The Veteran's low back disability was found to be due to her service-connected cervical spine disability.,Bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy, left knee disability, and right knee disability were found to be secondary to the Veteran's service-connected cervical spine disability.,No medical evidence supports a finding that the bilateral shoulder disabilities are related to service or service-connected conditions. The Veteran's claims for these disabilities are remanded.,The Veteran's headache disability was not found to be due to service, but her claim for secondary service connection is also remanded.

Claimed conditions
left upper extremity radiculopathy, right upper extremity radiculopathy, low back disability, left lower extremity radiculopathy, right lower extremity radiculopathy, left knee disability, right knee disability, left shoulder disability, right shoulder disability, headache disability
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 26, 2023
Citation
23058051

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23058051.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.