The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral foot condition, TMJ dysfunction, bilateral eye problem, and numbness in the left hand due to additional development of evidence and medical opinions.
The deciding factor: The issues are being remanded as there is insufficient evidence or inadequate examination reports to determine the etiology of the Veteran's conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Foot Condition, TMJ Dysfunction, Bilateral Eye Problem, Numbness in the Left Hand
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 27, 2023
- Citation
- 23058443
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23058443.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of adequate medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's pre-existing pes planus was aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for COPD and bilateral foot condition due to a lack of medical opinions regarding the onset and relationship to service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied increased ratings for various conditions, including right and left knee limitations of flexion, bilateral foot condition, skin condition, and PTSD. The Veteran's claims were not granted as her conditions did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection and an earlier effective date, finding that there was no evidence of current conditions or in-service aggravation to support these claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.