The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete development and a need for further examination regarding the appellant's mental health at the time of his misconduct.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for an adequate VA opinion regarding the appellant's mental state during service, as it relates to his discharge.
- Claimed conditions
- Other specified trauma/stressor-related disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 2, 2023
- Citation
- 23059196
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23059196.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has expanded the service connection claim to include any acquired psychiatric disorder. The Veteran's current diagnoses and in-service documentation of having an anxious affect or mood, along with post-discharge VA treatment records reflecting reports of psychiatric symptoms related to service, suggest a need for a VA examination to determine whether his claimed disability is related to his active service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for PTSD and other specified trauma/stressor-related disorder due to MST require further examination and opinion as they have not been adequately addressed in previous examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, is being remanded due to the need for additional development and clarification of her diagnoses.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.