The Board has determined that the appellant experienced an additional disability of his lung and diaphragm, which was not a progression of or result of a pre-existing condition. The claim is granted.
The deciding factor: There is an approximate balance of negative and positive evidence regarding whether the appellant's additional disability was proximately caused by negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on VA's part in furnishing medical treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- lung, diaphragm
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 7, 2023
- Citation
- 23059852
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23059852.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's COPD and respiratory disabilities, requiring a new VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's lung biopsy performed in August 2014 led to his death, but the AOJ has not obtained the informed consent document from Vista Imaging. The case is being remanded to obtain this record.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the DIC benefits claim due to lack of substantial compliance with its March 2022 remand directives. The survivor's pension claim is denied as the Appellant's income exceeds the maximum annual death pension rate.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's cause of death, sepsis, was not related to in-service exposure to herbicide agents.,The service-connected diabetes mellitus did not contribute substantially or materially to the Veteran's death from sepsis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.