Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's hypertension is denied as there is no evidence of a chronic condition in service and the gap between discharge and diagnosis is too large to establish continuity.,Tinnitus is granted as it is related to military noise exposure, despite the examiner's opinion that his MOS had a low probability for hazardous noise exposure.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder, including major depressive disorder, is remanded as there is insufficient evidence to determine if it is service-connected.,The right wrist condition is remanded due to lack of in-service diagnosis and treatment, despite the Veteran's reports of injury during service.,The respiratory condition is remanded as there was no diagnosed respiratory condition at the time of examination.

The deciding factor: Service connection cannot be established for hypertension because there is no evidence of a chronic condition in service and the gap between discharge and diagnosis is too large to establish continuity.,Tinnitus can be linked to military noise exposure, despite the examiner's opinion that his MOS had a low probability for hazardous noise exposure. The Veteran's lay statements are considered credible.,The acquired psychiatric disorder cannot be established as service-connected due to insufficient evidence of an in-service event or disease and the lack of continuity of symptomatology.,The right wrist condition is remanded because there was no diagnosed condition at the time of examination, despite the Veteran's reports of injury during service. The examiner did not consider functional impairment caused by pain.,The respiratory condition cannot be established as service-connected due to insufficient evidence of an in-service event or disease and the lack of continuity of symptomatology.

Claimed conditions
hypertension, tinnitus, anxiety and depression, right wrist condition, respiratory condition
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 9, 2023
Citation
23060479

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23060479.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.