Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's claim for right foot arthritis was reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. Service connection is now granted.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder (GAD) was found to be incurred in the line of duty, with no indication of willful misconduct or unauthorized absence. Service connection is granted.,Bilateral metatarsalgia (Morton's disease) was found to have been incurred in the line of duty and not due to willful misconduct. Service connection is granted.,Bilateral hallux valgus (bunions) was found to have been incurred in the line of duty and not due to willful misconduct. Service connection is granted.,Bilateral pes planus (fallen arches) was found to have been incurred in the line of duty and not due to willful misconduct. Service connection is granted.

The deciding factor: The new evidence submitted related to unestablished facts, raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating the Veteran's claims for right foot arthritis.,The PEB determined that the GAD was incurred in the line of duty and not due to willful misconduct or unauthorized absence.,The PEB found that bilateral metatarsalgia (Morton's disease) was incurred in the line of duty and not due to willful misconduct.,The PEB found that bilateral hallux valgus (bunions) was incurred in the line of duty and not due to willful misconduct.,The PEB found that bilateral pes planus (fallen arches) was incurred in the line of duty and not due to willful misconduct.

Claimed conditions
Right foot arthritis, Acquired psychiatric disorder (GAD), Bilateral metatarsalgia (claimed as Morton's disease), Bilateral hallux valgus (claimed as bunions), Bilateral pes planus (fallen arches)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
100%
Decision date
November 14, 2023
Citation
23060758

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23060758.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.