The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for cardiovascular disease and liver disability due to inadequate opinions from a VA examiner. The examiner needs to provide new opinions regarding whether in-service exposures caused these conditions, and if they were aggravated by any service-connected disabilities.
The deciding factor: The previous opinions did not adequately address the causal relationship between in-service exposures and the Veteran's cardiovascular disease and liver disability.
- Claimed conditions
- cardiovascular disease, liver disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 24, 2023
- Citation
- 23062377
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23062377.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted a 70 percent rating for PTSD and an initial 10 percent rating for a headache disability, while denying ratings in excess of 40 percent for a low back disability and any compensable rating for allergic rhinitis. Service connection was granted for tinnitus and bilateral foot disabilities but denied for other conditions.
- Dismissed
The appeal for issues related to eczema, IBS, headaches, liver disability, enlarged prostate and urinary frequency, allergic rhinitis, and restrictive lung disease were dismissed. The claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for allergic rhinitis was denied.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for tinnitus, but denied service connection for the other conditions listed.
- Partly granted
The Board denied earlier effective dates for nephrolithiasis and onychomycosis, dismissed an appeal seeking an earlier effective date for excision of cyst from the scalp, granted a 10 percent rating for excision of cyst from the scalp, and remanded entitlement to service connection for a liver disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.