The Board denied service connection for the Veteran's claimed disability of balance problems, finding that there was no evidence to support a nexus between his current condition and his military service.
The deciding factor: The medical opinions provided by VA examiners concluded that the Veteran did not have a diagnosis of a separate disability characterized as balance problems, and any issues with balance were related to his bilateral peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities.
- Claimed conditions
- balance problems
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 6, 2023
- Citation
- 23064834
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23064834.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issues of entitlement to a rating higher than 50 percent for migraine headaches and entitlement to special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance for TBI, as it needs further evidence and clarification.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed as moot because the issues were adjudicated in a January 2025 rating decision. The appellant can seek review of this decision within one year.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection claims for various conditions are being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding potential exposure to herbicides and asbestos during his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to duty-to-assist errors. The Veteran failed to attend scheduled VA examinations and the AOJ did not properly develop the claim in accordance with M21-1 provisions governing claims involving foreign residency.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.