Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for effective dates prior to June 28, 2017 have been denied.,The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for service-connected right knee disability has been remanded.,The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for service-connected bilateral conjunctivitis has been remanded.,The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating percent for service-connected right thigh lipoma has been remanded.

The deciding factor: No earlier effective date is warranted as there is no evidence of an earlier date of claim. The effective date for a grant of service connection is the day following the date of separation from active service or the date entitlement arose, if the claim is received within one year after separation from active service.,The Veteran's right knee disability has been rated at 10 percent since June 28, 2017. The current rating criteria do not support a higher evaluation as there is no evidence of limitation of flexion or extension beyond what is currently assigned.,The Veteran's bilateral conjunctivitis has been rated at 10 percent since June 28, 2017. The current rating criteria do not support a higher evaluation as there is no evidence of visual acuity impairment, visual field defect, muscle function impairment, or incapacitating episodes within the past year.,The Veteran's right thigh lipoma has been rated at zero percent since June 28, 2017. The current rating criteria do not support a higher evaluation as there is no evidence of pain, instability, underlying tissue damage, area greater than 144 square inches, or loss of range of motion, painful motion, or loss of function.

Claimed conditions
right foot plantar fasciitis, right knee degenerative arthritis (right knee disability), bilateral conjunctivitis, hemorrhoids, right thigh lipoma
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 7, 2023
Citation
23064989

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23064989.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.