Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for high blood pressure, colitis, and prostate cancer residuals are denied.,The Veteran's claims for bilateral elbow disability, bilateral shoulder disability, and erectile dysfunction are remanded.,The effective dates for the grants of service connection for vertigo, tinnitus, and bilateral hearing loss need to be determined.,The 30 percent rating for scalp laceration needs to be reconsidered.,The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for vertigo and scalp laceration are remanded.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable disability rating for bilateral hearing loss is remanded.

The deciding factor: There is no current diagnosis of high blood pressure or colitis, and the medical evidence does not support these claims.,The psychiatric disability is proximately due to service-connected disabilities, including vertigo, tinnitus, and scalp laceration.,The headache disability is directly related to service based on a personal examination by a private examiner.,Sleep apnea is proximately due to the Veteran's service-connected psychiatric disability.,Polymyalgia, prostate cancer residuals, back disability, and erectile dysfunction are inextricably intertwined with other claims and require further VA medical opinions.,The 30 percent rating for scalp laceration needs to be reconsidered as it is related to service-connected disabilities.,Increased ratings for vertigo and scalp laceration need to be considered based on the Veteran's service-connected disabilities.

Claimed conditions
high blood pressure, colitis, psychiatric disability, headache disability, sleep apnea
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 14, 2023
Citation
23066199

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23066199.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.