The Board remands the claim for additional development as the opinions of record are not entirely sufficient to decide the claim.
The deciding factor: The opinions provided do not conclusively address whether the Veteran's brain tumor clearly and unmistakably preexisted service or was aggravated by service, necessitating further medical opinion.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a brain tumor
- How they argued it
- Aggravation of a pre-existing condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 4, 2024
- Citation
- 24000669
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for residuals of a brain tumor and hypopituitarism due to an inadequate VA opinion.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a brain tumor, finding that the evidence does not support a link between the Veteran's condition and his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the claim for additional development to determine if the Veteran's brain tumor was aggravated by service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection of residuals of a brain tumor to obtain additional medical evidence regarding the relationship between the Veteran's in-service head injury and his current condition.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.