The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for chronic testalgia disability was withdrawn by the Veteran during his hearing. The new and material evidence received since the last final denial does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the psychiatric disability claim, as it fails to show any nexus between the current disability and service.,The Board denied the reopening of the claim for service connection for a psychiatric disability due to lack of new and material evidence. The Veteran's back disability was also denied as there is no competent medical evidence linking his current back condition to service.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the compensable rating for chronic testalgia disability during his hearing, effectively dismissing this issue.,The new and material evidence submitted since the last final denial does not provide a nexus between the psychiatric disability and service. The Board found that the Veteran's statements about mental health issues are redundant of previous statements and do not establish a new fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic testalgia, psychiatric disability (anxiety disorder depression, anger issues, insomnia, obsessive compulsive w/ narcissistic traits), back disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 4, 2024
- Citation
- 24000710
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,035 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24000710.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims of service connection for a back disability, endometriosis, thyroid condition, and chronic fatigue syndrome due to new evidence submitted since the last final denial. The claims are now considered on their merits.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete service treatment records and a need for additional VA examination. The Veteran's back disability is being reviewed again with new evidence.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for back, hip, and lower extremity disabilities due to a lack of VA examination and outstanding treatment records. The Veteran's current diagnoses and lay statements will be considered in determining if his conditions are related to service.
- Granted
The Veteran's adenocarcinoma of the colon is granted as secondary to his service-connected other specified trauma and stressor related disorder to include alcohol use disorder. The back disability claim is remanded for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.