Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The claims for right lower extremity numbness and left lower extremity numbness were denied due to lack of current diagnosed disabilities. The claim for service connection for a left foot disability is denied as the evidence does not show it was caused by a service-connected condition.,The claims for right lower extremity numbness and left lower extremity numbness were denied due to lack of current diagnosed disabilities. The claim for service connection for a left foot disability is denied as the evidence does not show it was caused by a service-connected condition.,The claim for service connection for a left foot disability, claimed as secondary to diabetes, is denied as there is no competent evidence showing that the disability is related to the Veteran's diabetes. The claim for service connection for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue is remanded due to insufficient evidence on record regarding its etiology.,The claim for service connection for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue is remanded due to insufficient evidence on record regarding its etiology, specifically concerning herbicide exposure.

The deciding factor: There was no current diagnosed disability for right or left lower extremity numbness and left foot disability.,There was no current diagnosed disability for right or left lower extremity numbness and left foot disability.,The evidence does not show that the left foot disability is caused by a service-connected condition, specifically diabetes.,The evidence does not establish herbicide exposure or provide sufficient medical opinion to determine if squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue was related to service.

Claimed conditions
Right lower extremity numbness, Left lower extremity numbness, Left foot disability, Squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 9, 2024
Citation
24001285

Veterans Law Judge

David H. Robertson

Decisions by this judge: 344 · Granted: 11% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24001285.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.