Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for COPD has been reopened and remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea to include as secondary to a service-connected right knee disability (with intermediary obesity) has been reopened and remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, to include major depression and PTSD, as secondary to a service-connected right knee condition has been reopened and remanded.

The deciding factor: New evidence submitted by the appellant indicates that exposure to workplace irritants, including dust, fumes, and battery components are associated with COPD. The Board finds this new evidence sufficient to reopen the claim for service connection for COPD.,The post-decision treatise indicates that lack of exercise can lead to weight gain and obesity which is related to obstructive sleep apnea. The Board finds this new evidence sufficient to reopen the claim for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea.,The appellant contends that the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder was caused by his chronic pain from his service-connected right knee condition. The post-decision treatise indicates that chronic pain shares some biological mechanisms with anxiety and depression. The Board finds this new evidence sufficient to reopen the claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder.

Claimed conditions
COPD, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Acquired Psychiatric Disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 11, 2024
Citation
24001979

Veterans Law Judge

Thomas English

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24001979.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.