The Veteran's claims for service connection for GERD, eye disability, right shin splint, chronic tinea pedis, and bilateral feet onychomycosis have all been denied. The Board found no evidence of a current disability or in-service injury that could be linked to these conditions.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claims were denied because there was no evidence of any in-service event or injury that could be linked to the claimed disabilities, and the Veteran did not provide sufficient medical evidence to support his assertions regarding the onset or etiology of these conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (claimed as acid reflux), Eye disability (claimed as diminished eye sight), Right shin splint, Chronic tinea pedis, Bilateral feet onychomycosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 16, 2024
- Citation
- 24002355
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,081 · Granted: 38% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 24002355.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for left and right shin splint disabilities, as well as his claim for service connection for a left knee condition.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for various conditions and denied earlier effective dates for the grant of service connection, except for a 10 percent rating for pseudofolliculitis barbae and a 20 percent rating for bilateral dry eye syndrome.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands all claims for further development, including obtaining outstanding VA treatment records and scheduling the Veteran for examinations to determine the severity of his bilateral shin splints and any right knee or lower leg disorder other than his service-connected right shin splint.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for right ankle disability, left ankle disability, right shin splint, and left shin splint. The Board found no evidence of a chronic or continuous bilateral ankle or shin splints during service or within one year after separation.,There was no evidence that the Veteran experienced symptoms of these conditions until years after separation from service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.