The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate VA opinions regarding secondary service connection and aggravation. The Veteran's trigeminal neuralgia is being examined again for a new opinion on whether it is related to her service-connected PTSD and migraines.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the May 2021 VA opinions are not adequate, requiring a new examination to consider recent treatment records and discuss their relevance to the Veteran's trigeminal neuralgia.
- Claimed conditions
- trigeminal neuralgia
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 19, 2024
- Citation
- 24003071
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 3,217 · Granted: 46% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24003071.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for skull injury/traumatic brain injury and trigeminal neuralgia, finding that there is no current disability related to active service.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him in need of the aid and attendance of another person, leading to a grant of special monthly compensation (SMC) based on aid and attendance.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral arm numbness is related to his military service and grants service connection for this condition.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for Bell's palsy and trigeminal neuralgia, finding that there was no current disability of Bell's palsy or chronic residuals related to it. For trigeminal neuralgia, the Board found insufficient evidence linking the condition to burn pit exposure during active duty.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.