The Board denied service connection for bilateral upper extremity ulnar neuropathy, bilateral lower extremity neuropathy, nasal septum deviation, bilateral knee patellofemoral pain syndrome, bilateral shoulder impingement syndrome, residuals of a right facial injury, mandibular hypo-mobility, and temporomandibular joint syndrome.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not support the claims as there was no medical nexus to service or a service-connected disability for any of the conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral upper extremity ulnar neuropathy, bilateral lower extremity neuropathy, nasal septum deviation, bilateral knee patellofemoral pain syndrome, bilateral shoulder impingement syndrome, residuals of a right facial injury, mandibular hypo-mobility, temporomandibular joint syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 23, 2024
- Citation
- 24003409
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus type II and bilateral lower extremity neuropathy, finding that the evidence did not support a causal relationship between these conditions and the Veteran's active military service.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed due to the Veteran's failure to substantially comply with claims processing rules.
- Partly granted
The Board granted readjudication of the claims for service connection for headaches, a sleep condition (OSA), Parkinsonism (including Parkinson's disease), unspecified depressive disorder, CAD with atrial fibrillation, bilateral upper extremity neuropathy, and bilateral lower extremity neuropathy based on new evidence. The claim for hyperhidrosis was denied as no new relevant evidence was received.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates and service connection for various conditions, as well as initial ratings higher than noncompensable for dermatitis and hypertension, and a rating higher than 20 percent for lumbar spine strain.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.