Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

Service connection for malaria is denied. The Veteran's claim has been reopened, but service connection cannot be established as there was no evidence of a current disability during or within one year after service.,Service connection for chronic kidney disease is granted. The Veteran's current diagnosis is linked to herbicide agent exposure during service.,Service connection for the heart disability (atherosclerosis of the aorta) is granted. The Veteran has a current diagnosis and there is evidence linking it to herbicide agent exposure.,Service connection for hyperlipidemia is denied. There is no disease or disability listed under VA regulations that corresponds with this condition.,Service connection for asbestosis is denied. There is no evidence of asbestos exposure during service, and the Veteran's claim cannot be granted based on presumptive service connection.,Service connection for chronic constipation (IBS) is denied. The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis or sufficient evidence linking it to service.,Service connection for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is denied. There is no evidence of GERD during service and the condition cannot be linked to herbicide agent exposure.,Service connection for cataract of the left eye is denied. The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis or sufficient evidence linking it to service.,Service connection for myasthenia gravis and double vision is granted. There is a current diagnosis and evidence linking it to herbicide agent exposure.

The deciding factor: The service medical records do not show any signs, symptoms, or treatment for malaria during service. The Veteran's claim has been reopened but cannot be granted as there was no evidence of a current disability during or within one year after service.,The Veteran is presumed to have been exposed to herbicide agents during service and has a current diagnosis of chronic kidney disease. Service connection can be established based on the presumption of exposure to herbicide agents.,The Veteran's heart disability (atherosclerosis of the aorta) is linked to herbicide agent exposure, as evidenced by his current diagnosis and reasoning provided in the March 2020 private medical opinion from Dr. B.,Hyperlipidemia is not listed under VA regulations as a disease or disability that can be granted based on service connection. The Veteran's claim for hyperlipidemia is denied.,There is no evidence of asbestos exposure during service and the Veteran's claim cannot be granted based on presumptive service connection for asbestosis.,The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis or sufficient evidence linking chronic constipation (IBS) to service. The condition is denied.,Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was not diagnosed during service and there is no evidence of GERD linked to herbicide agent exposure. The claim for GERD is denied.,There is no current diagnosis or sufficient evidence linking cataract of the left eye to service. The condition is denied.,Myasthenia gravis and double vision are currently diagnosed, and the March 2020 private medical opinion from Dr. B. provides reasoning that links it to herbicide agent exposure during service.

Claimed conditions
malaria, chronic kidney disease, atherosclerosis of the aorta (heart disability), hyperlipidemia, asbestosis, chronic constipation (IBS), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), cataract of the left eye, myasthenia gravis and double vision
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Gulf War
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 25, 2024
Citation
24003827

Veterans Law Judge

Harvey P. Roberts

Decisions by this judge: 2,645 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24003827.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.